Action, Ethics, and Responsibility (Topics in Contemporary by Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O'Rourke, Harry S. Silverstein

By Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O'Rourke, Harry S. Silverstein

Best philosophers discover accountability from quite a few views, together with metaphysics, motion conception, and philosophy of legislations.

Show description

Read Online or Download Action, Ethics, and Responsibility (Topics in Contemporary Philosophy) PDF

Best ethics & morality books

Einführung in die Phänomenologie der Erkenntnis: Vorlesung 1909

Der vorliegende Band enthält den textual content der Vorlesung, die Husserl unter dem Titel "Einführung in die Phänomenologie der Erkenntnis" in Göttingen im Sommersemester 1909 gehalten hat. Im ersten Teil dieser Vorlesung setzt Husserl sich mit dem Verhältnis von "allgemeiner Phänomenologie und phänomenologischer Philosophie" auseinander.

Virtue Ethics: Dewey And Macintyre (Continuum Studies in American Philosophy)

Smooth moral conception has skilled a resurgence of curiosity within the virtues. lengthy relegated to the traditional and medieval previous, advantage idea is now thought of through many to be a conceivable substitute to the differently dominant Kantian and Utilitarian moral theories. Alasdair Maclntyre is a primary determine during this stream, whose paintings types an increasing but constant and influential venture to deal with primary matters in moral concept and American tradition.

Alain Badiou: Philosophy and Its Conditions

An advent to Badiou's philosophical inspiration and its implications for different humanistic disciplines and the social sciences.

Nietzsche’s On the Genealogy of Morality: A Critical Guide

At the family tree of Morality is Nietzsche's so much influential, provocative, and tough paintings of ethics. during this quantity of newly commissioned essays, fourteen major philosophers supply clean insights into some of the work's valuable questions: How did our dominant values originate and what services do they truly serve?

Extra resources for Action, Ethics, and Responsibility (Topics in Contemporary Philosophy)

Example text

Philosophical interest in DDA stems from an assumption that the moral distinction between killing and letting die is reflective of a moral distinction between the broader categories of doing and allowing, so that the best way to explain the former is in terms of the latter (McMahan 1993, 250). 36 D. K. Chan What makes the assumption of a link between the two distinctions particularly attractive is the possibility of defining the categories of doing and allowing in nonmoral terms. Philosophical work on DDA involves showing that killing is impermissible because it involves doings that bring about harm, whereas the same harm resulting from letting die may be permissible as an instance of allowing a harm to occur.

Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility. Journal of Philosophy 66:828–839. Reprinted in Frankfurt 1988. 22 J. K. Campbell, M. O’Rourke, and H. S. Silverstein Frankfurt, H. 1988. The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ginet, C. 1966. Might We Have No Choice? In Freedom and Determinism, ed. K. Lehrer. New York: Random House. Ginet, C. 1990. On Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ginet, C. 2000. The Epistemic Requirements for Moral Responsibility.

And M. Ravizza. 1992. Quinn on Doing and Allowing. Philosophical Review 101:343–352. Foot, P. 1978. The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect. In Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press. Foot, P. 1984. Killing and Letting Die. In Abortion: Moral and Legal Perspectives, ed. J. L. Garfield and P. Hennessey. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press. Foot, P. 1985. Morality, Action, and Outcome. In Morality and Objectivity, ed.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.01 of 5 – based on 11 votes