By Charles M Dorn; Stanley S Madeja; Frank Robert Sabol
Read or Download Assessing expressive learning : a practical guide for teacher-directed, authentic assessment in K-12 visual arts education PDF
Similar study & teaching books
In retrospect over the 20th century, Hartoonian discusses the paintings of 3 significant architects: Peter Eisenman, Frank Gehry and Bernard Tschumi, in connection with their theoretical positions and historicizes present architecture within the context of the continued secularization of the myths surrounding the traditions of 19th century structure ordinarily, and, specifically, Gottfried Semper's discourse at the tectonic.
Outlines a software of R&D for the development of arithmetic skillability, and fairness in talent, between all U. S. college scholars.
Did you're keen on Math or technological know-how at school? have you ever performed video games that prompted your suggestion procedures for Math and technological know-how? attempting to be artistic on your Math, technological know-how or management classification? Can management study? Is management an artwork or a technological know-how or Math? trying to influence your education software with inventive video games?
"Architecture is a social paintings. If the perform of structure is the artwork of what you may make ensue, then i think that you're purely nearly as good as your bullpenthe developers, the engineers, the artisans, the colleagues, the staffwho collaborate with you; those that turn into possessed via a similar urge to construct, by way of an identical trust that we're engaged on whatever unprecedented jointly.
- Indigenous Modernities: Negotiating Architecture and Urbanism (Architext)
- Thoughts out of Season Part I
- Leshono Suryoyo: First Studies in Syriac
- Working Memory in Second Language Acquisition and Processing
- Symbols and Meanings in School Mathematics
- Understanding and Using English Grammar: Teacher's Guide
Additional info for Assessing expressive learning : a practical guide for teacher-directed, authentic assessment in K-12 visual arts education
The most commonly reported reasons were how well the criteria matched the objectives of the lesson and how well the criteria matched the content or concepts taught in the lesson. Art teachers chose evaluation criteria second most frequently, based on how well they matched the local curriculum guide content, state proficiency guide content, or national visual arts standards. Criteria also were selected by the characteristics observed in students’ work, by the needs of the students, by trial and error, by how well they matched the intent of the work with the product, by the level of art teachers’ knowledge of assessment, by how well they matched state-level assessments, and by how well they measured students’ growth.
References Armsrong, C. L. (1994). Designing assessment in art. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association. Beattie, D. K. (1997). Assessment in art education. Worchester, MA: Davis Publications. , King, L. , & Horkay, N. ). (1997). The NAEP guide (NCES Publication No. 97-990). S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics. Chittendon, E. (1991). Authentic assessment, evaluation, and documentation of student performance. In V. ), Expanding student assessment (pp. 22–31).
Additional criteria independently identified by students included “if my friends like it,” “if it is ‘cool,’” “if it matched the teachers’ example,” “if it looked better than the work of other students in the class,” and other criteria with no apparent relationship to works of art. 28 1 THE ASSESSMENT CONTEXT Analysis of preferred criteria based on the instructional level of students revealed distinct differences. Listed in order of priority, elementary students used the following criteria most frequently: use of the elements of art, skill, following the art teachers’ directions, details in the work, and neatness.